Reblogged on 30 Sep 2014 from owldude
27,141 notes | Permalink
qvarantine:

that why

qvarantine:

that why

Reblogged on 30 Sep 2014 from iamnotaconfusedboy
754,656 notes | Permalink
catchaglimpseofalleble:

mr-egbutt:

WAKE UP POTTER
WE’RE GOING TO THE ZOO

Oh i get it now.

catchaglimpseofalleble:

mr-egbutt:

WAKE UP POTTER

WE’RE GOING TO THE ZOO

Oh i get it now.

Reblogged on 30 Sep 2014 from iamnotaconfusedboy
472,092 notes | Permalink
brolinapproved:

catchaglimpseofalleble:

nikkysclit:

Can you not?

AHG, I fucked this up!

omfg I’ve seen the high school musical post about 15 times and I’ve never understood why it had so many notes. Now I finally understand

brolinapproved:

catchaglimpseofalleble:

nikkysclit:

Can you not?

AHG, I fucked this up!

omfg I’ve seen the high school musical post about 15 times and I’ve never understood why it had so many notes. Now I finally understand

(Source: doctor-in-a-policebox)

Reblogged on 30 Sep 2014 from owldude
3,074 notes | Permalink
owenhqrper:

Someone very nicely pointed out to me that I should have included sensual attraction in this graphic I made earlier. I’ve copy-pasta’d some of the more important text from that graphic although you should still read the other text too cause it’s still relevant! 

Firstly, the definitions on the graphic above are very very very very bare-bones, and it’s important to say that different people experience the different kinds of attraction in different ways, and also there are probably more kinds of attraction, but I believe these are the main ones and the most important to differentiate between.
Secondly, it’s also important to note that each person has their own limits and lines drawn between the different kinds of attraction. To some people, touching would be a reaction to aesthetic attraction; to others, it may be a romantic act; to others, sexual. Some people view kissing as sexual and others view it as romantic. Everyone, ace or allo, has their own borders and their own fences in between these different kinds of attraction and some don’t have any fences in between them at all, and just let them run around wild together. 
The first reaction I usually get when I explain the difference between sexual, romantic, and aesthetic attraction is something along the lines of “but no one looks at someone and just wants to have sex with them right away! everyone needs to get to know them first!” This argument is also a big part of demisexual erasure. Which is why I think it’s important to really differentiate between these types of attraction. And just because these three types of attraction go together for some doesn’t mean they go together for all. 

Again, and especially with the inclusion of sensual attraction, it’s important for me to point out that not everyone has the same standards for each type of attraction. What is included in sensual for some may be included in sexual for others. Asexual people can be sensually attracted to people and desire physical intimacy that doesn’t include sexual intercourse, in fact, many do. And I feel the need to point this out often and firmly because there are people in the asexual community invalidating EACH OTHER because few people seem to understand that not only is asexuality a spectrum, everyone exists on their own individual spectrum. 

owenhqrper:

Someone very nicely pointed out to me that I should have included sensual attraction in this graphic I made earlier. I’ve copy-pasta’d some of the more important text from that graphic although you should still read the other text too cause it’s still relevant! 

Firstly, the definitions on the graphic above are very very very very bare-bones, and it’s important to say that different people experience the different kinds of attraction in different ways, and also there are probably more kinds of attraction, but I believe these are the main ones and the most important to differentiate between.

Secondly, it’s also important to note that each person has their own limits and lines drawn between the different kinds of attraction. To some people, touching would be a reaction to aesthetic attraction; to others, it may be a romantic act; to others, sexual. Some people view kissing as sexual and others view it as romantic. Everyone, ace or allo, has their own borders and their own fences in between these different kinds of attraction and some don’t have any fences in between them at all, and just let them run around wild together. 

The first reaction I usually get when I explain the difference between sexual, romantic, and aesthetic attraction is something along the lines of “but no one looks at someone and just wants to have sex with them right away! everyone needs to get to know them first!” This argument is also a big part of demisexual erasure. Which is why I think it’s important to really differentiate between these types of attraction. And just because these three types of attraction go together for some doesn’t mean they go together for all. 

Again, and especially with the inclusion of sensual attraction, it’s important for me to point out that not everyone has the same standards for each type of attraction. What is included in sensual for some may be included in sexual for others. Asexual people can be sensually attracted to people and desire physical intimacy that doesn’t include sexual intercourse, in fact, many do. And I feel the need to point this out often and firmly because there are people in the asexual community invalidating EACH OTHER because few people seem to understand that not only is asexuality a spectrum, everyone exists on their own individual spectrum. 

Reblogged on 30 Sep 2014 from sixpenceee
473,278 notes | Permalink

(Source: lvloonlight)

Reblogged on 30 Sep 2014 from scarredmewtwo
5,601 notes | Permalink
TOMORROW IS OCTOBER

skelezor:

SOMEONE BRING OUT THE B O N E F L U T E

Reblogged on 30 Sep 2014 from scarredmewtwo
490 notes | Permalink
bmth-sws:

romance isn’t dead

bmth-sws:

romance isn’t dead

(Source: straightwhiteboystexting)

Reblogged on 30 Sep 2014 from scarredmewtwo
3,522 notes | Permalink
holztoons:

Boys and girls of every age, wouldn’t you like to see something strange?

holztoons:

Boys and girls of every age, wouldn’t you like to see something strange?

Reblogged on 30 Sep 2014 from scarredmewtwo
9,023 notes | Permalink

(Source: o3ou)

Reblogged on 30 Sep 2014 from spookycom
30,408 notes | Permalink
caseyanthonyofficial:

Me when I see one leaf turn vaguely orange

caseyanthonyofficial:

Me when I see one leaf turn vaguely orange

Reblogged on 30 Sep 2014 from zanetheaiden
1,152 notes | Permalink

zanetheaiden:

Old Spice needs to make a line of deodorant for women named after all of the Spice Girls

Reblogged on 30 Sep 2014 from zanetheaiden
251,604 notes | Permalink
monsieurpaprika:

vagisodium:

vintagegal:

House on Haunted Hill (1959)

tag your extreme horror please

WE WATCHED THIS IN HISTORY CLASS DURING MY SENIOR YEAR AND I THINK OUT OF ALL OF US MY TEACHER LAUGHED THE LOUDEST
monsieurpaprika:

vagisodium:

vintagegal:

House on Haunted Hill (1959)

tag your extreme horror please

WE WATCHED THIS IN HISTORY CLASS DURING MY SENIOR YEAR AND I THINK OUT OF ALL OF US MY TEACHER LAUGHED THE LOUDEST
monsieurpaprika:

vagisodium:

vintagegal:

House on Haunted Hill (1959)

tag your extreme horror please

WE WATCHED THIS IN HISTORY CLASS DURING MY SENIOR YEAR AND I THINK OUT OF ALL OF US MY TEACHER LAUGHED THE LOUDEST
monsieurpaprika:

vagisodium:

vintagegal:

House on Haunted Hill (1959)

tag your extreme horror please

WE WATCHED THIS IN HISTORY CLASS DURING MY SENIOR YEAR AND I THINK OUT OF ALL OF US MY TEACHER LAUGHED THE LOUDEST
monsieurpaprika:

vagisodium:

vintagegal:

House on Haunted Hill (1959)

tag your extreme horror please

WE WATCHED THIS IN HISTORY CLASS DURING MY SENIOR YEAR AND I THINK OUT OF ALL OF US MY TEACHER LAUGHED THE LOUDEST

monsieurpaprika:

vagisodium:

vintagegal:

House on Haunted Hill (1959)

tag your extreme horror please

WE WATCHED THIS IN HISTORY CLASS DURING MY SENIOR YEAR AND I THINK OUT OF ALL OF US MY TEACHER LAUGHED THE LOUDEST

Reblogged on 30 Sep 2014 from zanetheaiden
277,210 notes | Permalink

intosnarkness:

if you ever feel bad about yourself, just remember that one time i had to fly with my cello so we bought it a seat

and it got upgraded to first class

without me

Reblogged on 30 Sep 2014 from princejakers
523,516 notes | Permalink

spookutomeme:

grim-doll:

ottermatopoeia:

mattniskanenseyebrows:

OCTOBER IS NEXT WEEK

image

OCTOBER IS THIS WEEK
image

OCTOBER IS TOMORROW

image

OCTOBER IS TODAY IN SOME PLACES ALREADY

image

Reblogged on 30 Sep 2014 from zanetheaiden
23,956 notes | Permalink
purgeparty:

estando:

no war but the skeleton class war

the skeletariat will overthrow the bonegeoise 

purgeparty:

estando:

no war but the skeleton class war

the skeletariat will overthrow the bonegeoise